Telling it like it is, or it should be, or like it's going to be, or the way I wish it would be, or the way my girlfriend who just yelled at me told me it is
As everyone knows, Israel and Iran aren’t exactly Domino partners and they have cancelled all there mahjong events. The Middle East has become one of intense focus and scrutiny and any decision being made can have severe consequences. The game went from Old Maid to Crazy Eights to War. All of this because of one person’s belief that the other person should not exist. The hatred by these two parties are going to create a situation that can have long lasting affects on every aspect of everyone’s life. This is a stupid war made by stupid people that are old and act like children. The impact by these narcissists can be severe.
Some moron believes that their religion tells them that they must hate someone because they are of another religion…. you have to follow this…. a religion that says you have to hate someone…. that isn’t a real religion or maybe the person that is interpreting that religion is a stupid old man that just wants to hate someone. Iran’s Supreme Leader stating that all Zionists must be wiped off the face of the earth or something to that effect. “Former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad frequently used inflammatory language, stating in 2005 that Israel must be “erased from the page of time” or “wiped off the map”. This statement has been widely interpreted as a call for the physical destruction of Israel” and “Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has also made statements critical of Israel, calling it a “cancerous tumor that must be uprooted”. He has clarified that his call for Israel’s destruction does not equate to the annihilation of all Jews, but rather the demise of the state of Israel“. To be fair, the other side has made similar remarks but to be absolutely fair, Iran made them first.
Given those previous statements and if Iran would get nuclear grade weapons, even though Iran has stated that their purpose is not to use nuclear weapons on Israel, do you think they are being straight forward? Do you think they would sneak a dirty bomb to one of their proxies like Hezbollah or the Houthis? What would a nuclear war look like in the Middle East? Iran or Israel bombs the other and then the retaliation by the other side….. Given that most of the oil comes from the Middle East, that would severely hinder any and all gas run products, Elon Musk and Tesla would become de facto world dictator as their cars would take over (just kidding), the nuclear fallout would make a lot of that area unlivable. The nuclear fallout would affect so many countries it would paralyze the world. It would affect the prices and wages of every living person and thing. These are just some of the small things that I can think of. All because of hatred by some old morons that should be put away in a home and not be in charge of anything. It’s your old grandpa that keeps yelling get off of my lawn that is in charge over there.
These old folks are pure hatred and if they teach us anything they teach us that pure hatred solves nothing and creates way more problems. They have no reason to hate one another, they just do. Some of these old folks are a hoot…. Whatever the U.S. decides to do, it has no good choices. It has been put in a spot that you can’t win. That’s hatred for you….
Hatred…. pure hatred has severe consequences…. you hear that immigration hawks….. learn from these dumb dumbs…. stop the pure hatred.
Thank God that ICE was around, I heard that baby was a felon that murdered a cow for the milk.
The one thing that I can’t understand is that your main competitor in manufacturing is whooping you because it has cheap labor and not only is it cheap but they are good, effective workers. That makes them a double threat. That make good products at a cheap price. The only thing this country has to combat them is immigrants, who believe it or not are good cheap labor. They are not only good, they are excellent labor that works for cheap, giving this country a chance to combat the Chinese. While this immigrant labor will not be able to work highly technical jobs, they work the demanding mundane jobs that Americans will not do no matter how much you pay them. So why get rid of them, not the criminals, the criminals will end up costing more than they are worth but the ones that you didn’t know were here. The ones that work the farms, the kitchens, the hotel cleaners, the construction workers, the house cleaners.
Your thought is that you are going to get people that are on government assistance to do the jobs that these people were doing. These hard demanding jobs that while not highly technical in the sense they are not coding computers, they are physically demanding and take skill and patience while hardly paying anything. Well, you are dead wrong and its the worst economic move a country can do. This country was built on slave labor and you are not going to get an U.S. citizen to work that hard for that cheap and you are not going to get these companies to pay that much for shitty labor…. so what’s going to happen is, they are going to move their job overseas, thus defeating your intention of bringing manufacturing to America in the first place.
Now, I’m not the smartest person in the world, hell, I’m not even the smartest person in the room and I’m by myself but I know that getting rid of the cheapest hardest working labor force in America is the most idiotic move any one person can do, so why do it? Pure hatred. This guy, Stephen Miller, reminds me of what can happen when God isn’t paying attention and Hitler is reincarnated and for some reason sets his gaze on Hispanics. Well, the old saying of be careful what you wish for because you might get it might be the most appropriate sentiment. The over the top raids and that the FBI somehow now have become Immigration officers as well and surround a restaurant to go after the busboy is absolutely ridiculous. But one day, you will get what you want and then we can all laugh and laugh at how the economy has collapsed because people can’t afford to keep their businesses open creating a deficit in tax collection and forcing the rich to pay way more, to wit, they will set up residence in France.
Change in society requires an erosion technique not a tornado technique. This means that change you want should be subtle and over time not abrupt and expect people to just go along with what you want. You are out of touch with real society and it will back fire in a big way.
In the end, the Chinese plan of stealing all your proprietary secrets to all your hi tech stuff and then stop manufacturing your stuff all together and force you to buy their stuff or go without will work because Americans are dumb and addicted to youtube and Tiktok and can’t think beyond a four word phrase “Show me the money”.
Pictured in uniform is Jose Mendoza Lopez and pictured with the sign is Harvey Milk. Recently, there has been some discussion on the removal of Harvey Milk’s name being removed from a Navy Replenishment Oiler. For those who don’t know, that’s a Navy ship, whose main mission is to re-supply other ships or military bases with needed items. While not exactly a “battle ship”, it still serves an important role in keeping the Navy running smoothly. The political left is outraged and stating that you don’t have anything better than to do than renaming a ship, while some have said that the only reason that they are doing it is because Harvey Milk was gay and it’s a clear sign of homophobia. The right is saying that it is an honor to have a Military frigate named after you and it should go to the most deserving and should be something with a warrior mentality that makes you proud to serve on it.
So who is right? Should thought be put into naming Military bases and freighters and equipment or should any old name be used? How about the USS Dahmer, that would terrify our opposition. Nothing stokes fear into the enemy more than a cannibal. How about the USS Liberace? If we can’t kill them we will show tune them to death. We can even bedazzle the boat with little gems and rhinestones. The truth is that the ship should have been named something else in the first place.
Harvey Milk’s claim to fame is that he broke some kind of barrier by becoming the first openly gay person to serve in an elected office, in San Francisco…. California. Milk did serve in the military but did not serve in combat but was in the military during the Korean War. Milk was discharged on an “other than honorable” service category from the military, most likely due to his homosexuality but it’s not clear what happened. Milk was also said to have pursued a sexual relationship with a 16 year old boy while he was in his 30’s but was never charged. Some accounts place the child at 17 while others state that they didn’t do anything sexual until the person was 18. It’s really not clear what happened but in all honesty, do you think that the Democrats made the right call naming a ship after this guy?
The other guy pictured above is Jose M Lopez. He was a Medal of Honor recipient who was credited for single handedly saving his whole company. His accommodation, who was written by his commander and told by eye witnesses, reads as such: “On his own initiative, he carried his heavy machine gun from Company K’s right flank to its left in order to protect that flank, which was in danger of being overrun by advancing enemy infantry supported by tanks. Occupying a shallow hole offering no protection above his waist, he cut down a group of 10 Germans. Ignoring enemy fire from an advancing tank, he held his position and cut down 25 more enemy infantry attempting to turn his flank. Glancing to his right, he saw a large number of infantry swarming in from the front. Although dazed and shaken from the enemy artillery fire that had crashed into the ground only a few yards away, he realized that his position would soon be outflanked. Again, alone, he carried his machine gun to a position to the right rear of the sector; enemy tanks and infantry were forcing a withdrawal. Blown backward by the concussion of enemy fire, he immediately reset his gun and continued his fire. Single-handedly, he held off the German horde until he was satisfied that his company had effected its retirement. Again, he loaded his gun on his back, and in a hail of small arms fire, he ran to a point where a few of his comrades were attempting to set up another defense against the onrushing enemy. He fired from this position until his ammunition was exhausted. Still carrying his gun, he fell back with his small group to Krinkelt. Sgt. López’s gallantry and intrepidity, on seemingly suicidal missions in which he killed at least 100 of the enemy were almost solely responsible for allowing Company K to avoid being enveloped, to withdraw successfully and to give other forces coming up in support time to build a line which repelled the enemy drive.”
Given the bravery of Msgt. Lopez and the accusations of Mr. Milk, why is it that the Demos are so up in arms about the renaming of the ship, even though it probably won’t be named after Msgt. Lopez? The Demos had a decision to make and they decided to name a ship after a pedophile just because he was gay and for no other reason. If Milk had been gay and saved his company, it would be a different story, but he was gay and pursued a minor. If Milk had not been gay, the Demos wouldn’t even care who he was. Do you see why people are losing faith in the Democrats? They put zero thought into their decisions that they make and then complain when someone tries to correct them with some kind of unhinged political correctness and warped sense of right and wrong. It’s incredibly stupid that we even have to discuss this. Msgt. Lopez, who put his life on the line and saved countless lives with his bravery has no military items named after him but the guy that got elected by other gay people somehow deserves to be immortalized.
My advice to the democrats, stop crying over spilled Milk.
You want to resolve the manufacturing problem? Pass a law that says if you are a company making a certain amount of money in America, you must have at least 5 to 10 percent of your product made in America or go sell somewhere else, product gets banned. Given that we buy more products than the next three top countries put together, you won’t have enough people to fill the manufacturing jobs that will be at your doors. Problem solved. You don’t only go after the countries that have real cheap labor but also the companies that are greedy and profit off of that cheap labor.
California just paid out a whopping $4 Billion settlement, that’s just Los Angeles County, for sexually assaulting little boys in half way homes, foster care homes, State funded children centers, churches and at juvenile detention centers. It’s ok though, because the State apologized and now its all better, the booboo is gone. Right, that’s how it works, you say “my bad” and the sexually abused children are now all better because of your words and I’m guessing the $4 Billion that tax payers have to shell out doesn’t hurt, well, it doesn’t hurt the people receiving it, not compared to what those fucking nasty predators did to them. The tax payer, they’re fucked…… in a whole different way than those children were. That was a cringy way to say that but I feel it needed to be said.
Per the Los Angeles Times…. “Los Angeles County has reached a $4 billion agreement to settle nearly 7,000 claims of sexual abuse in juvenile facilities since 1959, officials said Friday.”
“The agreement, which still needs approval from the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, far surpasses a $2.6 billion settlement reached in 2022 with Boy Scouts of America that was the largest aggregate sexual abuse settlement in U.S. history at the time.“…… “And last year the Archdiocese of Los Angeles agreed to pay $800 million to victims of clergy sexual abuse, bringing the total payout to more than $1.5 billion“
Lets be clear on something, the Boy Scouts, the juvenile detention center and the clergy thing were all done by homosexual males. The foster care thing and the child centers were probably also all homosexuals that did it, but not one mention of the people that did it. So somewhere between 99% to 100% of these incidents that cost tax payers upwards of $5 Billion dollars were committed by homosexuals. Money that could be used for anything else…. better schools (that the homosexual predators will try to infiltrate), better forest management (where these homosexual predators would take some of their victims), lower income tax and property tax (where these homosexual predators would uh… have dungeons but no dragons?) I apologize for making jokes, I probably shouldn’t but that is how I deal with stuff. The problem, as always, I’m not funny, this making the situation even worse. It’s like Elon making a joke about his vandalized cars, “they destroyed my vehicles and now I have to make a sad Tesla”. Jesus, that was stupid.
This blarticle, unlike all others, is a criticism of homosexuals. They state how that they are often criticized and how people discriminate against them and they are a tight knit community that will persevere even in the face of adversity and hate but they say nothing to the authorities when one or more of them are sexually abusing a child, even though they are such a tight knit community who all of a sudden are not that tight knit. They hold these parties and parades but have no clue what they are doing, it all seems a little Diddy to me. A shit load of people that have temporary amnesia or were blind and deaf at the time these incidents occurred. Not one of them stepped forward to the authorities to report anything because they all say they knew nothing. Come on… even Diddy isn’t trying to pass off that lie. Nobody believes the Diddy people and no one believes that not one of the homosexual people in that community had no idea that these abuses were happening.
You might ask, how does this relate to the Democrats? Good question….. who asked that? I’m sure it was a Democrat. Let me be vague…. I have no idea except to say that Democrats are the champions of the equality of homosexuals but also not really, democrats, for some reason think homosexuals are better than heterosexuals. These payouts represent the decisions made by Democrats. These decisions led to these abuses and these payouts.
The Democrats put in place safeguards against male prison guards when it comes to female prisons due to rapes but in doing so they chose not to place any safeguards against homosexual prison guards because they somehow believed that homosexuals are better people and wouldn’t rape a child? They put safeguards when heterosexuals are in compromising situations but not homosexuals, even though empirical evidence suggests, sorry, flat out states that homosexuals will take advantage of a child 1000% more than a heterosexual or 11 times more or a 11 to 1 ratio. But yeah, by all means, keep championing their stances of being alone with children in kindergarten classes and juvenile detention centers and foster care and adoptions. You’re right, the roughly 300,000 children that were sexually assaulted by them should not be enough for you to place those safeguards….. and that’s in LA county alone. Does this make me a homo-racist, (I’m not a homophobe, I don’t care you exist, I care you hurt people)? And this is the ones we know about, not the ones that went to court and had the courts shoot down their claims due to political pressures or because the courts want to protect an institution or from children that would not come forward due to embarrassment and anxiety.
They say that only 20% of sexual assaults are actually exposed, that would mean that the real number, in LA county alone is more likely 5 times what is being reported, so somewhere between 1,500,000 and 2,500,000. This is taking into account for bias numbers being reported by the papers and authorities to try and stave off what would be a horrific collapse of a system due to stupidity and personal bias. They would purposely lower those numbers as much as possible because elections are right around the corner.
This was happening way back in 1959…. I’m pretty sure this was reported to the proper authorities and ignored…. who the hell was the head of the FBI back then? Another funny on my part… it was none other than J. Edgar Hoover, the grand pedophile himself. What a fucked up system.
I’m not saying that all homosexuals do this but that they are more likely to do this as stated by the FBI, DHS, HHS, NIH and a host of many other initials. I don’t care the reasons why homosexuals do it, I just care that these stupid ass politicians that refuse to see the truth because they are so fucking woke. I’m not telling you to imprison homosexuals who have done nothing wrong, I’m telling you to do your due diligence so it makes it almost impossible for anyone to do something wrong. If it means don’t hire homosexuals for kindergarten classes, then don’t. If it means put cameras in classes, then do that. If it means asking people about their sexuality prior to hire, when it comes to the safety of children, then what the fuck…., just do it… but stop being so fucking woke that you endanger my child or any child. You want to champion a cause, be the politician that had no sexual assaults cases in their district or State, no matter whose feelings get hurt.
Do you remember when former U.S. Attorney Merrick Garland complained about parents in school meetings? The parents were upset because some homosexual school teacher was propagating some scenario that the parents felt was homosexual grooming. The parents complaints were taken as threats by the Justice Department and he told the FBI to investigate the parents like they were domestic terrorists. The parents complaint was that minor children under a certain age did not need to learn about sexual education and anything that they needed to know at that age, it was up to the parent to teach their children not a homosexual teacher. Merrick Garland, with all his wisdom, disagreed, flat out making it seem that the homosexual teacher was a more suitable person to teach third graders about sex. The above taxpayer having to dish out a shitload of money scenarios explain why Mr. Garland was wrong. I think Mr. Garland doesn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground. His ass is where the homosexual wants to stick their dicks, the hole in the ground is where he puts this countries morals. But this is the democrats at work, their wokeness over everyone’s safety.
I understand this is a harsh criticism of a particular group of people and I understand that not all homosexuals are bad people or pedophiles.
Like the proverbial political pendulum politics proves people….. ehhhh … something with a p….. pugilistic? pedantic? pluralistic? pedestrian? perplexed? perturbed? I could keep going but my Sesame Street dictionary slash thesaurus has run out of words starting with p that would make sense. The current political environment has some lefty politicos asking questions, some on instagram or tik tok or facebook, but it’s all the same question, why didn’t you vote for us? I think they deserve an answer.
I’m going to start with a simple answer that most people might not agree with. Do you guys remember Bob Dole? The one thing I remember at the time was the guy saying “what’s wrong with cigarettes?” You remember that. Claiming that cigarettes might not be addictive. I voted for the other guy. Obviously cigarette companies were funding that Republican ticket, in part, and he was going to go to bat for them. The Democrats seized on that and stated flat out that this guy didn’t care about anyone. Fast forward some however many years later, the Democrats say the same thing about marijuana that ol’ Bob said about cigarettes. The difference, the marijuana lobby gives a lot of money to the Democrats.
I heard the stories that marijuana isn’t as addictive as nicotine or alcohol by the left leaning dumb dumbs and so they justify their support for the hemp and the pork gratuities they receive from the lobbyists. My opinion, no, the facts are that they’re full of shit. I guess if you have enough power and money you can always find a doctor to say what you want. I know that some of the most prominent left leaning leaders of the democrat party are for it, Bill Maher (might be the only issue I disagree with Bill Maher on), Seth Rogan, Bernie Sanders, Former President Obama, Snoop, and many others… but the fact is that marijuana is a gateway drug and in my former community, marijuana created more havoc than any other drug. I have never known one person that the first drug that they used was something else other than marijuana…. but I know people that died from speed balling, cocaine use, meth and heroin. They all started the same way, smoking a joint. Am I saying that if they didn’t smoke marijuana, they wouldn’t haven’t used the heavier drugs? Yes…. for the love of God… yes. Marijuana got them there as they chased the dragon to new heights and marijuana is the reason they died. For the poor marijuana is an even heavier burden because, unlike the middle class or the rich, there is no rehab stints. The poor and lower middle class have to work and can’t revolve their vacation time around rehab. Poor peoples rehab is called county lock up, which comes with many other problems. The idea that legalized marijuana will solve the drug problem is absolutely ridiculous. If you thought that the punishment that you received for smoking marijuana was too harsh, then you lower the punishment not make the drug legal. Once you introduce something into society, there is no taking it back. Remember Abolition and how well that worked. There’s a reason why the U.S. keeps slipping down the education world table and it isn’t only because of tik tok and youtube.
The disastrous decision by the democrats to legalize marijuana isn’t going to have a great impact immediately, it’s going to take a while like their last great effort to push small businesses into minority neighborhoods. Back in the 70’s there were complaints by the Democrats about the SBA not giving loans equally to minorities. That led to small businesses being brought to minority neighborhoods, mostly liquor stores, because everyone knew that would be the best enterprises in those neighborhoods. 30 years later, you have those same democrats complaining that minority neighborhoods are being exploited and that there is a liquor store at every other corner, this time meant in a derogatory way. The funny thing is (or the worse thing), those people that actually succeeded with those enterprises… no longer live in those minority neighborhoods. They take the money they made and move to Republican cities….why? Because Republicans use the money they make from their businesses and invest in schools, infrastructure and safety…. while the Democrat neighborhoods are investing in jails, meth clinics and embezzlement. The Democrats don’t even stipulate that with a loan or by giving a business an opportunity to open in a minority neighborhood, you have to live in that neighborhood. They don’t invest in their neighborhoods and they complain like it someone else’s fault that the neighborhoods are that way. Unfortunately, more minority neighborhood mayors are arrested or indicted than any other, mostly for embezzlement or abuse of power or under the Hobbs Act. It has become a ridiculous situation with bad decision after bad decision.
At least the Democrats will have a new business in between those liquor stores in minority communities, a marijuana dispensary. The owner of those stores won’t live in that community but the people getting high and barely making rent will. Thanks Demos, another thing that you made better because you can’t see three feet in front of you. And for the rich people with a ton of money, live in one of these neighborhoods for 2 years and then tell me that you think allowing marijuana is a smart decision. And before you say that it was on the ballot and the voters voted for it, I will remind you that those same voters would vote to eliminate all taxes if that proposal was on the ballot. Smart people know that would be disastrous but most people won’t give a damn, they would only think an extra 10 to 40 grand in their pocket. You’re suppose to be the grown up… but all you care about is being liked, winning that next popularity contest that keeps you in office.
Facts about marijuana:
Cannabis is the most commonly used federally illegal drug in the United States; 52.5 million people, or about 19% of Americans, used it at least once in 2021.
Recent research estimated that approximately 3 in 10 people who use cannabis have cannabis use disorder. (a fancy way of saying they’re addicted)
The risk of developing cannabis use disorder is even greater for people who begin to use it before age 18.
Cannabis use directly affects the parts of the brain responsible for memory, learning, attention, decision-making, coordination, emotion, and reaction time. (so it makes you dumb and if you are already dumb, than dumber. So either Jeff Daniels or Jim Carrey. You can forget about being that lawyer, sports star or elected official. These scenarios are for regular long term users, not the occasional spliff and also meant for people that are born normal and not with 180 IQ like some of these people who smoke to control their overactive brains)
Infants, children, and teens (who still have developing brains) are especially susceptible to the adverse effects of cannabis.
Long-term or frequent cannabis use has been linked to increased risk of psychosis or schizophrenia in some users.
Why the fuck would you make this legal unless it was to create zombies.
More reasons why the Democrats are getting whipped at the polling stations to come.
There is this big hoopla about the release of the JFK files. Who did it and why? As these reporters delve into the released files and the CIA taking front stage by knowing of Lee Harvey Oswald movements prior to the assassination of JFK, supposedly, it sure looks like that…. either the CIA was an ineffective agency that had no clue to what was going on or that they knew and might even had a small part in it. Reportedly, this is something that was reported at the time, the CIA and JFK were not on good terms. The question is, who reported that? McCone, the Director of Central Intelligence, even though he was a Republican, was nominated by Kennedy and he admired Kennedy because Kennedy actually read his reports and listened to his advice. McCone was not at odds with Kennedy. Also, it wasn’t the CIA’s responsibility to track Oswald while he was in the U.S., it was the FBI’s. The CIA reported the information to Hoover about Oswald and the FBI was suppose to track him because the CIA was prohibited from running any ops inside the USA unless they were attached to another law enforcement agency who would take lead in the operation.
The questions I have…. have nothing to do with Oswald, they have a lot to do with Jack Ruby. The first question I have is, who knew that Jack Ruby was an FBI informant and a homosexual? That his position as an FBI informant was scrubbed right prior to his assassination of Oswald? Who knew that J. Edgar Hoover, also a homosexual, was at odds with the Kennedy administration prior to his assassination due to wanting to have Hoover replaced? Who knew that Jack Ruby, Oswald’s killer, had spent the days prior to the assassination and the day of the assassination with Bob Vanderslice, another FBI informant, sexuality unknown? Who knew that New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, tried to prosecute Clay Shaw, another homosexual and FBI Informant, David Ferrie, an FBI Informant, homosexual and known pedophile, and Guy Bannister, a once employee of the FBI, and probably human asset for the FBI, who Shaw and Ferrie worked for as CI’s? Who knew the J. Edgar Hoover was accused of having sex with underage boys, never formally investigated or convicted, in both Louisiana and in California and that those incidents were reported to RFK, who probably told JFK?
This is from Wikipeadia from excerpts from the Warren Commission investigation and FBI investigation…. “On November 25, Martin was contacted by the FBI. Martin told the FBI that Ferrie might havehypnotized Oswald into assassinating Kennedy. The FBI considered Martin’s evidence unreliable. Nevertheless, FBI agents interviewed Ferrie twice about Martin’s allegations.[30] Ferrie admitted that he had made public and private statements criticizing Kennedy’s actions during the Bay of Pigs, but he denied ever stating that the President should be killed. He stated that he had no recollection of having met Oswald and if he had the meeting would have been “very casual”.[31] Ferrie stated that Martin had “bedeviled him in every manner possible” since sending him out of Gill’s office in an “undiplomatic manner” in June 1963.[32][33] Gill told the FBI that Martin blamed Ferrie for not getting a job and subsequently “slandered Ferrie at every opportunity”.[22] The FBI also interviewed about 20 other people in connection with Martin’s allegations. The FBI said that it was unable to develop a substantial case against Ferrie. An inquiry by the House Select Committee on Assassinations, conducted a decade and a half later, concluded that the FBI’s “overall investigation of the 544 Camp Street issue at the time of the assassination was not thorough.”[34]“
This from the Guardian derived from an interview of a top FBI Agent and supervisor who gave statements to both the FBI and Warren Commission….. “Other accounts of the Director’s alleged sexual activity, if true, would certainly have destroyed him had they become public. A former Bureau inspector and trusted associate named Jimmy Corcoran said years later that Hoover, youthful at the time, had once asked him to deal with a serious “problem”. He had been arrested on sex charges involving a young man during a trip to New Orleans. Corcoran, who had powerful contacts in the state, said he intervened to hush the matter up.” The charges were not brought forward at the State level but I believe that they were secretly sent to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, most likely because the person that was investigating was disgusted by the situation and if he could not do anything abut it, he thought maybe the U.S. Attorney could. That could be where RFK first learned about this incident. This would be the same New Orleans where Ferrie resided and who had been arrested twice on moral offensive charges, most likely sodomy or oral gratification of another man or receiving oral gratification from another man.
J. Edgar Hoover became head of what would be known as the FBI in 1924. Hoover remained in control of the FBI until his death in 1972, never having kids, in the traditional sense, or getting married. Hoover was intelligent and deliberate. He was extremely organized and a great chess player, again, not in the traditional sense that I am aware of…. but maybe. Hoover managed to stay in position as the head of the most elite organizations in America for 48 years. Along the way, Hoover hired his people and made them in charge of different sections within that agency, like Clyde Tolson, his second in command. He was secretive, intelligent, somewhat charismatic, a little dramatic, extremely organized, sought power and if his penis was the size of a thimble, he fit the exact FBI profile of a pedophile.
All these remarks can be verified except for smiling Jack being an FBI informant, only the FBI can verify that statement, if anyone is still around from that time.
While my post seems over the top, if you think about what we know of MKUltra and COINTELPRO and how Hoover managed to stay in power for so long, its an amazing ride for him. The FBI is always tasked with investigating incoming Presidents and legislators, anything that the Hoover found out was his to disseminate as he chose. Hoover was meticulous and has his people follow every bread crumb, especially when it came to Presidents. They had no secrets from him. Anything that was embarrassing or illegal would remain in his files and in exchange or just in case.
Other information about the now deceased director said that J. Edgar Hoover was said to frequent a hotel in La Jolla, California where young Mexican boys, likely underage, were brought to him and then paid for their services and sent back to Mexico with money in their pockets.
If any of this is true, and all these allegation were printed by multiple sources, and if RFK and JFK had found out about this, do you think that J. Edgar Hoover would use his immense power and influence to kill a President and his brother?
This post states through a direct quote from an FBI investigator that Oswald might have been hypnotized into wanting to assassinate the President, has that ever happened before? Reagan…. Trump? And who has the ability to do something like that? According to these articles, the FBI were one of the very few with that technology.
What the FBI has stated in their profiling of these pedophiles, is that they seek powerful positions but rarely elected positions. They travel in groups but never very large, it will most likely garner too much attention. They have some sort of signals so they can identify each other, I’m guessing.
This is a true story, I was once asked what time it was by a guy, I looked at my watch and told him the time, you know, like a normal person that was asked would do, and he replied “never mind”. I asked him, “if you didn’t want to know, why did you ask?” He just shook his head and said “never mind”. I was on a flight from somewhere back to Newark, NJ. When I got home, this was sticking in my mind for some reason, being former law enforcement, when people act like dip shits I usually wanted to know why, but since it isn’t a crime to be a dipshit, I couldn’t do anything to find out. I told my girlfriend about the incident, “the weirdest thing happened to me” and I told her the story. She, being a flight attendant at the time, started to laugh. I asked why are you laughing and she said that is how homosexuals try to find out if you are homosexual, its one of their signals. My thought was, well I’m glad that the response for that wasn’t giving him the right time because that would have been awkward. I never found out what their response was, I never cared but it resonates that pedophiles most likely have the same kind of signals or signs, kinda like a gang sign, I guess. And for the record, I used to be handsome, according to my ex anyway.
The thing that we know is that homosexuals, according to the NIH (if I read that right) a government entity, are 11 times greater to be pedophiles than heterosexuals. That makes sense, a grown man trying to rape another grown man would be almost impossible because even a small grown man, with an adrenaline flow as he tries to stop another grown man from sticking something up his ass, would fight to the death, (I would), which then would just make it necrophilia. Homosexuals would have to prey on young kids, like the priests and altar boys.
Really quick, I want to say that this isn’t an article about homosexuals being pedophiles, I am aware that not all homosexuals are pedophiles but that most pedophiles are homosexual, this also according to the FBI profilers. This is about the person that commissioned most of these studies and that he was most likely the most prolific pedophile in the history of the United States and due to his position and power, no one would stop him. And, maybe when that one person that did try, he most likely had him killed. There is no doubt that the FBI was infiltrated by these people because of Hoover but it is unknown if it is still that way. There are court cases that are being dismissed that relate to some of this but the dismissals make no sense, it only protects people that already have a ton pf power.
Other discerning facts about pedophiles are…. they aren’t generally gym rats but as times change so do they, they are charismatic and usually try to endear themselves to you, they are the cockroaches of the human race… meaning that they adapt quickly to their environment and many lack empathy, probably all of them. They don’t pack a punch in their genital region and are usually close to being considered innies. Like I stated prior, they are intelligent, they have to be and very conniving. And they were fiercely loyal to each other, given that not many people share their interests, like Tolson was to Hoover.
Also, I believe that Hoover died while being investigated by the FBI. A stress heart attack in his sleep. His second in command, Tolson, who became the Director of the FBI for one day before being replaced by Patrick Gray, fell ill immediately after handing over the keys to the house to Gray. Tolson would die a short while later from the affects of a stress induced stroke. Also the tell tale signs of an FBI investigation. Hoover fought hard to not relinquish power but it was ultimately the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation into him that killed him. If you want to see files relevant to the assassination of JFK and RFK, then you need to request the files into the investigation into J. Edgar Hoover, I believe that should be the files that should be asked for without redaction.
This is just my opinion but it makes way more sense then the conspiracy theories that are already out there. If I had to guess, this would be my guess, especially given how the FBI was ostracized by the Warren commission for doing such a shitty job in investigating the death of JFK. The FBI investigated and they couldn’t find themselves, it seems right. J. Edgar Hoover was most likely a very bad person but he didn’t care. Now, if I build a hotel and name it Hitler’s House, you can assume something about anyone in that hotel. Whoever named the FBI building must of not known Hoover’s legacy but still, that is some nasty stuff, right.
Can you imagine the fallout or the consequences if what I opine is correct? And it most likely is. That the head of the FBI was diddling little kids in secret and killed a President to keep that secret. Do you know what that would have done to the reputation of the FBI at that time and all the cases that they were involved in if that had come out. They would have to have freed everyone they ever arrested. No, killing Hoover and his longtime gaypal was the only solution.
We have to give to the Democrats, they bring people together. Can you tell me any other group that has the ability to make Neo-Nazis and Jewish people be on the same side? They have an answer to that question, the answer is that Trans men people, or is it trans thems? or trans those? (I really don’t know the pronouns) should be able to compete against women in sports, even though that has nothing to do with the question. I used to be a Democrat, now I’m like the Palestinians, stuck in a party that was hijacked by causes that aren’t important and completely convoluted from the truth and where there is no true leadership, so I switched to Independent that will vote Republican under the right circumstances as I wait for the Democrats to figure out their Trans….ition to a real political party that represents the people and takes up causes that affect the majority of the party.
The far-left has basically hijacked a party that under Bill Clinton was blowing away the competition. Ehhhh…..
Right, maybe blowing away was where it really took the wrong turn during that administration but the Demos, a party I proudly backed, has become a party of the underdogs. They seem to take up the causes of these underdog groups, which was fine when it was about racism or gender equality but it’s not ok when it comes to terrorism and guys dressing up in drag and punching women in the face. Not every underdog deserves to win, sometimes the favorites are right and deserve to win. The trick is to have the normalcy to be able to know which one is which.
I’m not going to lie, I was going to say have the common sense to do the right thing but it would immediately turn off the left because the right seems to have beaten them to the common sense slogan and to be fair, in some aspects, in having common sense.
I have seen some far left politicos taking up the battle for Free Palestine. These are people with college degrees that are making fun of their opposition for working at Hooters prior to becoming a political employee but when are asked what does it mean to say Free Palestine and the history of that portion of the world, they can’t give you an intelligent answer and only say that somehow, the people that were there for over three thousand years, were forced to leave their land by Christians and Muslims, that returned to make a country for themselves that their ancestors had, were oppressing the people that attacked them.
Now, if I have it wrong, I’m open to some type of discourse but what I see and hear is that some Democrats are taking up the side of Hamas, not to be mistaken for Ham and eggs, which, if that was the side they were on, I would be relieved, because I love me a good breakfast, but it doesn’t seem that way and it looks like they are on the side of Hamas, the U.S. designated Terrorist organization that looks to wipe out the Jewish Religion in its entirety.
This is one of the reasons why I, and maybe a lot of people, switched to Independent that will most likely lean right….. more to come.
Let me start with that I agree with some stances of the current administration…. Cartels are definitely terrorist organizations, and the Tariffs on China are completely warranted, so much so that they should be the only country we should focus on when implementing those tariffs and I also agree that NATO should be over and that we should get rid of it, but not in the way that this administration wants to, just the opposite. I think that the best way to get rid of NATO is it make it unnecessary. That would be by doing something that takes courage, obliterating the current state of Russia. The war, that was initiated by Russia, is the perfect opportunity to limit the this world to just two world super powers. The tariffs would make mince meat of the other, with some added caveats.
This is the time for the U.S. to let Ukraine go head strong into Russia by providing it with long range missiles and by placing interceptor missiles in range to stop any foolish attempt by Russia to launch nuclear arms and have our own missiles ready to strike every nuclear site that Russia has, with the help of the EU. With Russia’s old and rotting nuclear weaponry being what it is, this war should be over in a month. There is no doubt that we would win, less doubt that Russia would cave in less than a month, and we would have the added bonus of sending a very firm and powerful message to China that land grabs will not be tolerated.
While I might be a little naive as to Russia’s nuclear capability, I’m pretty sure that it would not get that far. After it’s all said and done, there would be no more Russia. Russia would suffer the fate it wanted to impose on Ukraine. It would be split up into smaller countries with no nuclear capabilities with some of their land going to Ukraine, who would no doubt still mine those minerals for us and some of it’s land going to us, the U.S., as the biggest military establishment and base on Earth. Where would that be located, oddly enough, it would be right above China and next to North Korea. To the victor go the spoils, in this case, to us making Russia into russia, we get a huge chunk of their land and the message will be, if you don’t want your land taken from you, then you don’t try and take someone’s land by force.
The added bonus of this happening, no more NATO fees because NATO won’t be needed. It’s a save save situation. For this to happen though, you need some courage, some teamwork and some God blessed luck, which I believe we would have. I always say, don’t leave this problem for our kids to handle, they’re busy gaming, we need to handle this right now or in 100 years, I can almost guarantee that China will be the only super power. Time to man up…..
Whichever President does this goes down as the second greatest President in history. It will be hard to beat Lincoln, but only history will tell and lets be honest, the Demos aren’t exactly the courageous type, (they had two opportunities to intervene and all they did was clear their throat) so it’s going to have to be a Repub that saves the world and this is the only way to that victory.
While a lot of people think this is Saul “Canelo” Alvarez versus Golden Boy, it’s actually Canelo vs Jaime Munguia. Not that I wouldn’t have minded a prime Oscar De La Hoya fight versus a prime Saul Alvarez, but every time machine I invented to get these prime fights set up hasn’t worked (it’s just me trying to create an E=mc squared time warp, sounds cool right, but all I’m doing is turning the lights on and off really fast……. yep, still no time warp) so we would have to opine on who would win, I’m going to call it a draw, Canelo v DLH… not Canelo v. Munguia. The Alvarez vs Munguia fight is something else, there will definitely be a winner if it isn’t a draw. Who will win… well, that’s what this blarticle is all about.
Let’s start with the Champion and pound for pound (if this were England) the dollar for dollar… moolah making, Ben Franklin printing ($100), cabbage creating, cheddar chasing, brass bringing boxing king… Canelo Alvarez… pictured above forgetting he’s an orthodox fighter…. Canelo is undoubtedly the money man of boxing. There are few fights or fighters that are as lucrative as Canelo, if any. The only person that matches Canelo’s status as a must see fighter is Ryan Garcia (who did not cheat, I’m going to call BS on that, he just has to be careful about who he associates with) and Gervonta Davis… and that’s not with every fighter they face, like Canelo. Crawford and Inoue are good fighters but they just don’t have the drawing power of these other fighters. Now for the fight at hand…. Canelo, a sure shot hall of famer, will have his work cut out for him. To be honest, I would have bet the house on Canelo before Jaime started to train with Freddie Roach. I would have said that Canelo ko’s Munguia in 7, easy. But with Roach in the picture, it changes the equation. I say this fight went from an easy fight for Alvarez to a dangerous fight for Alvarez. For Alvarez to win, he can’t just do what he ordinarily does, because as sure as your mama hated you for having a big ass head when you were born, Freddie Roach is going to come up with a gameplan that has a lot of potential to succeed. Canelo is going to have to be a little trickier and goad the big fella into a firefight, then use his slight movements to make Munguia miss while countering him with big shots. Once Munguia starts to get wary of Canelo’s power…. he can then walk the taller fighter down and land at will. Once again, body shots are going to be key.
Now, for the undefeated challenger, who hails from Tijuana, Mexico. Jaime no nickname Munguia, pictured above in what seems to be AI footage of his head on someone else’s body, to be victorious, he first and foremost needs to listen to Freddie Roach’s instructions and follow the gameplan that was outlined for him. If the younger Munguia can follow the instructions of his corner, his chances of winning rise exponentially. I’m pretty sure that Freddie is going to tell Jaime to move laterally, so as not to let Alvarez set his feet, use a long jab, and when the opportunity presents itself, or even if it doesn’t, throw that hard right down the middle to keep the iron chinned Alvarez occupied. The knockout will most likely not come so down chase it, chase the the points, that’s most likely the outcome of this fight. I’m pretty sure that they might try to emulate Bivol.
It’s going to be a great fight. My prediction is that the Mexican guy will win. Good luck to both fighters both really good guys.
mannysblog.com 