EVEN MORE REASONS WHY THE DEMOCRATS ARE FALLING BEHIND

California just paid out a whopping $4 Billion settlement, that’s just Los Angeles County, for sexually assaulting little boys in half way homes, foster care homes, State funded children centers, churches and at juvenile detention centers. It’s ok though, because the State apologized and now its all better, the booboo is gone. Right, that’s how it works, you say “my bad” and the sexually abused children are now all better because of your words and I’m guessing the $4 Billion that tax payers have to shell out doesn’t hurt, well, it doesn’t hurt the people receiving it, not compared to what those fucking nasty predators did to them. The tax payer, they’re fucked…… in a whole different way than those children were. That was a cringy way to say that but I feel it needed to be said.

Per the Los Angeles Times…. “Los Angeles County has reached a $4 billion agreement to settle nearly 7,000 claims of sexual abuse in juvenile facilities since 1959, officials said Friday.”

“The agreement, which still needs approval from the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, far surpasses a $2.6 billion settlement reached in 2022 with Boy Scouts of America that was the largest aggregate sexual abuse settlement in U.S. history at the time.“…… “And last year the Archdiocese of Los Angeles agreed to pay $800 million to victims of clergy sexual abuse, bringing the total payout to more than $1.5 billion“

Lets be clear on something, the Boy Scouts, the juvenile detention center and the clergy thing were all done by homosexual males. The foster care thing and the child centers were probably also all homosexuals that did it, but not one mention of the people that did it. So somewhere between 99% to 100% of these incidents that cost tax payers upwards of $5 Billion dollars were committed by homosexuals. Money that could be used for anything else…. better schools (that the homosexual predators will try to infiltrate), better forest management (where these homosexual predators would take some of their victims), lower income tax and property tax (where these homosexual predators would uh… have dungeons but no dragons?) I apologize for making jokes, I probably shouldn’t but that is how I deal with stuff. The problem, as always, I’m not funny, this making the situation even worse. It’s like Elon making a joke about his vandalized cars, “they destroyed my vehicles and now I have to make a sad Tesla”. Jesus, that was stupid.

This blarticle, unlike all others, is a criticism of homosexuals. They state how that they are often criticized and how people discriminate against them and they are a tight knit community that will persevere even in the face of adversity and hate but they say nothing to the authorities when one or more of them are sexually abusing a child, even though they are such a tight knit community who all of a sudden are not that tight knit. They hold these parties and parades but have no clue what they are doing, it all seems a little Diddy to me. A shit load of people that have temporary amnesia or were blind and deaf at the time these incidents occurred. Not one of them stepped forward to the authorities to report anything because they all say they knew nothing. Come on… even Diddy isn’t trying to pass off that lie. Nobody believes the Diddy people and no one believes that not one of the homosexual people in that community had no idea that these abuses were happening.

You might ask, how does this relate to the Democrats? Good question….. who asked that? I’m sure it was a Democrat. Let me be vague…. I have no idea except to say that Democrats are the champions of the equality of homosexuals but also not really, democrats, for some reason think homosexuals are better than heterosexuals. These payouts represent the decisions made by Democrats. These decisions led to these abuses and these payouts.

The Democrats put in place safeguards against male prison guards when it comes to female prisons due to rapes but in doing so they chose not to place any safeguards against homosexual prison guards because they somehow believed that homosexuals are better people and wouldn’t rape a child? They put safeguards when heterosexuals are in compromising situations but not homosexuals, even though empirical evidence suggests, sorry, flat out states that homosexuals will take advantage of a child 1000% more than a heterosexual or 11 times more or a 11 to 1 ratio. But yeah, by all means, keep championing their stances of being alone with children in kindergarten classes and juvenile detention centers and foster care and adoptions. You’re right, the roughly 300,000 children that were sexually assaulted by them should not be enough for you to place those safeguards….. and that’s in LA county alone. Does this make me a homo-racist, (I’m not a homophobe, I don’t care you exist, I care you hurt people)? And this is the ones we know about, not the ones that went to court and had the courts shoot down their claims due to political pressures or because the courts want to protect an institution or from children that would not come forward due to embarrassment and anxiety.

They say that only 20% of sexual assaults are actually exposed, that would mean that the real number, in LA county alone is more likely 5 times what is being reported, so somewhere between 1,500,000 and 2,500,000. This is taking into account for bias numbers being reported by the papers and authorities to try and stave off what would be a horrific collapse of a system due to stupidity and personal bias. They would purposely lower those numbers as much as possible because elections are right around the corner.

This was happening way back in 1959…. I’m pretty sure this was reported to the proper authorities and ignored…. who the hell was the head of the FBI back then? Another funny on my part… it was none other than J. Edgar Hoover, the grand pedophile himself. What a fucked up system.

I’m not saying that all homosexuals do this but that they are more likely to do this as stated by the FBI, DHS, HHS, NIH and a host of many other initials. I don’t care the reasons why homosexuals do it, I just care that these stupid ass politicians that refuse to see the truth because they are so fucking woke. I’m not telling you to imprison homosexuals who have done nothing wrong, I’m telling you to do your due diligence so it makes it almost impossible for anyone to do something wrong. If it means don’t hire homosexuals for kindergarten classes, then don’t. If it means put cameras in classes, then do that. If it means asking people about their sexuality prior to hire, when it comes to the safety of children, then what the fuck…., just do it… but stop being so fucking woke that you endanger my child or any child. You want to champion a cause, be the politician that had no sexual assaults cases in their district or State, no matter whose feelings get hurt.

Do you remember when former U.S. Attorney Merrick Garland complained about parents in school meetings? The parents were upset because some homosexual school teacher was propagating some scenario that the parents felt was homosexual grooming. The parents complaints were taken as threats by the Justice Department and he told the FBI to investigate the parents like they were domestic terrorists. The parents complaint was that minor children under a certain age did not need to learn about sexual education and anything that they needed to know at that age, it was up to the parent to teach their children not a homosexual teacher. Merrick Garland, with all his wisdom, disagreed, flat out making it seem that the homosexual teacher was a more suitable person to teach third graders about sex. The above taxpayer having to dish out a shitload of money scenarios explain why Mr. Garland was wrong. I think Mr. Garland doesn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground. His ass is where the homosexual wants to stick their dicks, the hole in the ground is where he puts this countries morals. But this is the democrats at work, their wokeness over everyone’s safety.

I understand this is a harsh criticism of a particular group of people and I understand that not all homosexuals are bad people or pedophiles.

MORE ON WHY THE DEMOCRATS LOST THEIR WAY

Like the proverbial political pendulum politics proves people….. ehhhh … something with a p….. pugilistic? pedantic? pluralistic? pedestrian? perplexed? perturbed? I could keep going but my Sesame Street dictionary slash thesaurus has run out of words starting with p that would make sense. The current political environment has some lefty politicos asking questions, some on instagram or tik tok or facebook, but it’s all the same question, why didn’t you vote for us? I think they deserve an answer.

I’m going to start with a simple answer that most people might not agree with. Do you guys remember Bob Dole? The one thing I remember at the time was the guy saying “what’s wrong with cigarettes?” You remember that. Claiming that cigarettes might not be addictive. I voted for the other guy. Obviously cigarette companies were funding that Republican ticket, in part, and he was going to go to bat for them. The Democrats seized on that and stated flat out that this guy didn’t care about anyone. Fast forward some however many years later, the Democrats say the same thing about marijuana that ol’ Bob said about cigarettes. The difference, the marijuana lobby gives a lot of money to the Democrats.

I heard the stories that marijuana isn’t as addictive as nicotine or alcohol by the left leaning dumb dumbs and so they justify their support for the hemp and the pork gratuities they receive from the lobbyists. My opinion, no, the facts are that they’re full of shit. I guess if you have enough power and money you can always find a doctor to say what you want. I know that some of the most prominent left leaning leaders of the democrat party are for it, Bill Maher (might be the only issue I disagree with Bill Maher on), Seth Rogan, Bernie Sanders, Former President Obama, Snoop, and many others… but the fact is that marijuana is a gateway drug and in my former community, marijuana created more havoc than any other drug. I have never known one person that the first drug that they used was something else other than marijuana…. but I know people that died from speed balling, cocaine use, meth and heroin. They all started the same way, smoking a joint. Am I saying that if they didn’t smoke marijuana, they wouldn’t haven’t used the heavier drugs? Yes…. for the love of God… yes. Marijuana got them there as they chased the dragon to new heights and marijuana is the reason they died. For the poor marijuana is an even heavier burden because, unlike the middle class or the rich, there is no rehab stints. The poor and lower middle class have to work and can’t revolve their vacation time around rehab. Poor peoples rehab is called county lock up, which comes with many other problems. The idea that legalized marijuana will solve the drug problem is absolutely ridiculous. If you thought that the punishment that you received for smoking marijuana was too harsh, then you lower the punishment not make the drug legal. Once you introduce something into society, there is no taking it back. Remember Abolition and how well that worked. There’s a reason why the U.S. keeps slipping down the education world table and it isn’t only because of tik tok and youtube.

The disastrous decision by the democrats to legalize marijuana isn’t going to have a great impact immediately, it’s going to take a while like their last great effort to push small businesses into minority neighborhoods. Back in the 70’s there were complaints by the Democrats about the SBA not giving loans equally to minorities. That led to small businesses being brought to minority neighborhoods, mostly liquor stores, because everyone knew that would be the best enterprises in those neighborhoods. 30 years later, you have those same democrats complaining that minority neighborhoods are being exploited and that there is a liquor store at every other corner, this time meant in a derogatory way. The funny thing is (or the worse thing), those people that actually succeeded with those enterprises… no longer live in those minority neighborhoods. They take the money they made and move to Republican cities….why? Because Republicans use the money they make from their businesses and invest in schools, infrastructure and safety…. while the Democrat neighborhoods are investing in jails, meth clinics and embezzlement. The Democrats don’t even stipulate that with a loan or by giving a business an opportunity to open in a minority neighborhood, you have to live in that neighborhood. They don’t invest in their neighborhoods and they complain like it someone else’s fault that the neighborhoods are that way. Unfortunately, more minority neighborhood mayors are arrested or indicted than any other, mostly for embezzlement or abuse of power or under the Hobbs Act. It has become a ridiculous situation with bad decision after bad decision.

At least the Democrats will have a new business in between those liquor stores in minority communities, a marijuana dispensary. The owner of those stores won’t live in that community but the people getting high and barely making rent will. Thanks Demos, another thing that you made better because you can’t see three feet in front of you. And for the rich people with a ton of money, live in one of these neighborhoods for 2 years and then tell me that you think allowing marijuana is a smart decision. And before you say that it was on the ballot and the voters voted for it, I will remind you that those same voters would vote to eliminate all taxes if that proposal was on the ballot. Smart people know that would be disastrous but most people won’t give a damn, they would only think an extra 10 to 40 grand in their pocket. You’re suppose to be the grown up… but all you care about is being liked, winning that next popularity contest that keeps you in office.

Facts about marijuana:

Cannabis is the most commonly used federally illegal drug in the United States; 52.5 million people, or about 19% of Americans, used it at least once in 2021.

Recent research estimated that approximately 3 in 10 people who use cannabis have cannabis use disorder. (a fancy way of saying they’re addicted)

The risk of developing cannabis use disorder is even greater for people who begin to use it before age 18.

Cannabis use directly affects the parts of the brain responsible for memory, learning, attention, decision-making, coordination, emotion, and reaction time. (so it makes you dumb and if you are already dumb, than dumber. So either Jeff Daniels or Jim Carrey. You can forget about being that lawyer, sports star or elected official. These scenarios are for regular long term users, not the occasional spliff and also meant for people that are born normal and not with 180 IQ like some of these people who smoke to control their overactive brains)

Infants, children, and teens (who still have developing brains) are especially susceptible to the adverse effects of cannabis.

Long-term or frequent cannabis use has been linked to increased risk of psychosis or schizophrenia in some users.

Why the fuck would you make this legal unless it was to create zombies.

More reasons why the Democrats are getting whipped at the polling stations to come.

IS “WHO KILLED JFK” THE RIGHT QUESTION?

There is this big hoopla about the release of the JFK files. Who did it and why? As these reporters delve into the released files and the CIA taking front stage by knowing of Lee Harvey Oswald movements prior to the assassination of JFK, supposedly, it sure looks like that…. either the CIA was an ineffective agency that had no clue to what was going on or that they knew and might even had a small part in it. Reportedly, this is something that was reported at the time, the CIA and JFK were not on good terms. The question is, who reported that? McCone, the Director of Central Intelligence, even though he was a Republican, was nominated by Kennedy and he admired Kennedy because Kennedy actually read his reports and listened to his advice. McCone was not at odds with Kennedy. Also, it wasn’t the CIA’s responsibility to track Oswald while he was in the U.S., it was the FBI’s. The CIA reported the information to Hoover about Oswald and the FBI was suppose to track him because the CIA was prohibited from running any ops inside the USA unless they were attached to another law enforcement agency who would take lead in the operation.

The questions I have…. have nothing to do with Oswald, they have a lot to do with Jack Ruby. The first question I have is, who knew that Jack Ruby was an FBI informant and a homosexual? That his position as an FBI informant was scrubbed right prior to his assassination of Oswald? Who knew that J. Edgar Hoover, also a homosexual, was at odds with the Kennedy administration prior to his assassination due to wanting to have Hoover replaced? Who knew that Jack Ruby, Oswald’s killer, had spent the days prior to the assassination and the day of the assassination with Bob Vanderslice, another FBI informant, sexuality unknown? Who knew that New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, tried to prosecute Clay Shaw, another homosexual and FBI Informant, David Ferrie, an FBI Informant, homosexual and known pedophile, and Guy Bannister, a once employee of the FBI, and probably human asset for the FBI, who Shaw and Ferrie worked for as CI’s? Who knew the J. Edgar Hoover was accused of having sex with underage boys, never formally investigated or convicted, in both Louisiana and in California and that those incidents were reported to RFK, who probably told JFK?

This is from Wikipeadia from excerpts from the Warren Commission investigation and FBI investigation…. “On November 25, Martin was contacted by the FBI. Martin told the FBI that Ferrie might have hypnotized Oswald into assassinating Kennedy. The FBI considered Martin’s evidence unreliable. Nevertheless, FBI agents interviewed Ferrie twice about Martin’s allegations.[30] Ferrie admitted that he had made public and private statements criticizing Kennedy’s actions during the Bay of Pigs, but he denied ever stating that the President should be killed. He stated that he had no recollection of having met Oswald and if he had the meeting would have been “very casual”.[31] Ferrie stated that Martin had “bedeviled him in every manner possible” since sending him out of Gill’s office in an “undiplomatic manner” in June 1963.[32][33] Gill told the FBI that Martin blamed Ferrie for not getting a job and subsequently “slandered Ferrie at every opportunity”.[22] The FBI also interviewed about 20 other people in connection with Martin’s allegations. The FBI said that it was unable to develop a substantial case against Ferrie. An inquiry by the House Select Committee on Assassinations, conducted a decade and a half later, concluded that the FBI’s “overall investigation of the 544 Camp Street issue at the time of the assassination was not thorough.”[34]“

This from the Guardian derived from an interview of a top FBI Agent and supervisor who gave statements to both the FBI and Warren Commission….. “Other accounts of the Director’s alleged sexual activity, if true, would certainly have destroyed him had they become public. A former Bureau inspector and trusted associate named Jimmy Corcoran said years later that Hoover, youthful at the time, had once asked him to deal with a serious “problem”. He had been arrested on sex charges involving a young man during a trip to New Orleans. Corcoran, who had powerful contacts in the state, said he intervened to hush the matter up.” The charges were not brought forward at the State level but I believe that they were secretly sent to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, most likely because the person that was investigating was disgusted by the situation and if he could not do anything abut it, he thought maybe the U.S. Attorney could. That could be where RFK first learned about this incident. This would be the same New Orleans where Ferrie resided and who had been arrested twice on moral offensive charges, most likely sodomy or oral gratification of another man or receiving oral gratification from another man.

J. Edgar Hoover became head of what would be known as the FBI in 1924. Hoover remained in control of the FBI until his death in 1972, never having kids, in the traditional sense, or getting married. Hoover was intelligent and deliberate. He was extremely organized and a great chess player, again, not in the traditional sense that I am aware of…. but maybe. Hoover managed to stay in position as the head of the most elite organizations in America for 48 years. Along the way, Hoover hired his people and made them in charge of different sections within that agency, like Clyde Tolson, his second in command. He was secretive, intelligent, somewhat charismatic, a little dramatic, extremely organized, sought power and if his penis was the size of a thimble, he fit the exact FBI profile of a pedophile.

All these remarks can be verified except for smiling Jack being an FBI informant, only the FBI can verify that statement, if anyone is still around from that time.

While my post seems over the top, if you think about what we know of MKUltra and COINTELPRO and how Hoover managed to stay in power for so long, its an amazing ride for him. The FBI is always tasked with investigating incoming Presidents and legislators, anything that the Hoover found out was his to disseminate as he chose. Hoover was meticulous and has his people follow every bread crumb, especially when it came to Presidents. They had no secrets from him. Anything that was embarrassing or illegal would remain in his files and in exchange or just in case.

Other information about the now deceased director said that J. Edgar Hoover was said to frequent a hotel in La Jolla, California where young Mexican boys, likely underage, were brought to him and then paid for their services and sent back to Mexico with money in their pockets.

If any of this is true, and all these allegation were printed by multiple sources, and if RFK and JFK had found out about this, do you think that J. Edgar Hoover would use his immense power and influence to kill a President and his brother?

This post states through a direct quote from an FBI investigator that Oswald might have been hypnotized into wanting to assassinate the President, has that ever happened before? Reagan…. Trump? And who has the ability to do something like that? According to these articles, the FBI were one of the very few with that technology.

What the FBI has stated in their profiling of these pedophiles, is that they seek powerful positions but rarely elected positions. They travel in groups but never very large, it will most likely garner too much attention. They have some sort of signals so they can identify each other, I’m guessing.

This is a true story, I was once asked what time it was by a guy, I looked at my watch and told him the time, you know, like a normal person that was asked would do, and he replied “never mind”. I asked him, “if you didn’t want to know, why did you ask?” He just shook his head and said “never mind”. I was on a flight from somewhere back to Newark, NJ. When I got home, this was sticking in my mind for some reason, being former law enforcement, when people act like dip shits I usually wanted to know why, but since it isn’t a crime to be a dipshit, I couldn’t do anything to find out. I told my girlfriend about the incident, “the weirdest thing happened to me” and I told her the story. She, being a flight attendant at the time, started to laugh. I asked why are you laughing and she said that is how homosexuals try to find out if you are homosexual, its one of their signals. My thought was, well I’m glad that the response for that wasn’t giving him the right time because that would have been awkward. I never found out what their response was, I never cared but it resonates that pedophiles most likely have the same kind of signals or signs, kinda like a gang sign, I guess. And for the record, I used to be handsome, according to my ex anyway.

The thing that we know is that homosexuals, according to the NIH (if I read that right) a government entity, are 11 times greater to be pedophiles than heterosexuals. That makes sense, a grown man trying to rape another grown man would be almost impossible because even a small grown man, with an adrenaline flow as he tries to stop another grown man from sticking something up his ass, would fight to the death, (I would), which then would just make it necrophilia. Homosexuals would have to prey on young kids, like the priests and altar boys.

Really quick, I want to say that this isn’t an article about homosexuals being pedophiles, I am aware that not all homosexuals are pedophiles but that most pedophiles are homosexual, this also according to the FBI profilers. This is about the person that commissioned most of these studies and that he was most likely the most prolific pedophile in the history of the United States and due to his position and power, no one would stop him. And, maybe when that one person that did try, he most likely had him killed. There is no doubt that the FBI was infiltrated by these people because of Hoover but it is unknown if it is still that way. There are court cases that are being dismissed that relate to some of this but the dismissals make no sense, it only protects people that already have a ton pf power.

Other discerning facts about pedophiles are…. they aren’t generally gym rats but as times change so do they, they are charismatic and usually try to endear themselves to you, they are the cockroaches of the human race… meaning that they adapt quickly to their environment and many lack empathy, probably all of them. They don’t pack a punch in their genital region and are usually close to being considered innies. Like I stated prior, they are intelligent, they have to be and very conniving. And they were fiercely loyal to each other, given that not many people share their interests, like Tolson was to Hoover.

Also, I believe that Hoover died while being investigated by the FBI. A stress heart attack in his sleep. His second in command, Tolson, who became the Director of the FBI for one day before being replaced by Patrick Gray, fell ill immediately after handing over the keys to the house to Gray. Tolson would die a short while later from the affects of a stress induced stroke. Also the tell tale signs of an FBI investigation. Hoover fought hard to not relinquish power but it was ultimately the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation into him that killed him. If you want to see files relevant to the assassination of JFK and RFK, then you need to request the files into the investigation into J. Edgar Hoover, I believe that should be the files that should be asked for without redaction.

This is just my opinion but it makes way more sense then the conspiracy theories that are already out there. If I had to guess, this would be my guess, especially given how the FBI was ostracized by the Warren commission for doing such a shitty job in investigating the death of JFK. The FBI investigated and they couldn’t find themselves, it seems right. J. Edgar Hoover was most likely a very bad person but he didn’t care. Now, if I build a hotel and name it Hitler’s House, you can assume something about anyone in that hotel. Whoever named the FBI building must of not known Hoover’s legacy but still, that is some nasty stuff, right.

Can you imagine the fallout or the consequences if what I opine is correct? And it most likely is. That the head of the FBI was diddling little kids in secret and killed a President to keep that secret. Do you know what that would have done to the reputation of the FBI at that time and all the cases that they were involved in if that had come out. They would have to have freed everyone they ever arrested. No, killing Hoover and his longtime gaypal was the only solution.

is it FREE PALESTINE! or FREE PALESTINE? or maybe FREE PALESTINE (from HAMAS)

We have to give to the Democrats, they bring people together. Can you tell me any other group that has the ability to make Neo-Nazis and Jewish people be on the same side? They have an answer to that question, the answer is that Trans men people, or is it trans thems? or trans those? (I really don’t know the pronouns) should be able to compete against women in sports, even though that has nothing to do with the question. I used to be a Democrat, now I’m like the Palestinians, stuck in a party that was hijacked by causes that aren’t important and completely convoluted from the truth and where there is no true leadership, so I switched to Independent that will vote Republican under the right circumstances as I wait for the Democrats to figure out their Trans….ition to a real political party that represents the people and takes up causes that affect the majority of the party.

The far-left has basically hijacked a party that under Bill Clinton was blowing away the competition. Ehhhh…..

Right, maybe blowing away was where it really took the wrong turn during that administration but the Demos, a party I proudly backed, has become a party of the underdogs. They seem to take up the causes of these underdog groups, which was fine when it was about racism or gender equality but it’s not ok when it comes to terrorism and guys dressing up in drag and punching women in the face. Not every underdog deserves to win, sometimes the favorites are right and deserve to win. The trick is to have the normalcy to be able to know which one is which.

I’m not going to lie, I was going to say have the common sense to do the right thing but it would immediately turn off the left because the right seems to have beaten them to the common sense slogan and to be fair, in some aspects, in having common sense.

I have seen some far left politicos taking up the battle for Free Palestine. These are people with college degrees that are making fun of their opposition for working at Hooters prior to becoming a political employee but when are asked what does it mean to say Free Palestine and the history of that portion of the world, they can’t give you an intelligent answer and only say that somehow, the people that were there for over three thousand years, were forced to leave their land by Christians and Muslims, that returned to make a country for themselves that their ancestors had, were oppressing the people that attacked them.

Now, if I have it wrong, I’m open to some type of discourse but what I see and hear is that some Democrats are taking up the side of Hamas, not to be mistaken for Ham and eggs, which, if that was the side they were on, I would be relieved, because I love me a good breakfast, but it doesn’t seem that way and it looks like they are on the side of Hamas, the U.S. designated Terrorist organization that looks to wipe out the Jewish Religion in its entirety.

This is one of the reasons why I, and maybe a lot of people, switched to Independent that will most likely lean right….. more to come.

You Kraine, I Kraine, We All Kraine….

Let me start with that I agree with some stances of the current administration…. Cartels are definitely terrorist organizations, and the Tariffs on China are completely warranted, so much so that they should be the only country we should focus on when implementing those tariffs and I also agree that NATO should be over and that we should get rid of it, but not in the way that this administration wants to, just the opposite. I think that the best way to get rid of NATO is it make it unnecessary. That would be by doing something that takes courage, obliterating the current state of Russia. The war, that was initiated by Russia, is the perfect opportunity to limit the this world to just two world super powers. The tariffs would make mince meat of the other, with some added caveats.

This is the time for the U.S. to let Ukraine go head strong into Russia by providing it with long range missiles and by placing interceptor missiles in range to stop any foolish attempt by Russia to launch nuclear arms and have our own missiles ready to strike every nuclear site that Russia has, with the help of the EU. With Russia’s old and rotting nuclear weaponry being what it is, this war should be over in a month. There is no doubt that we would win, less doubt that Russia would cave in less than a month, and we would have the added bonus of sending a very firm and powerful message to China that land grabs will not be tolerated.

While I might be a little naive as to Russia’s nuclear capability, I’m pretty sure that it would not get that far. After it’s all said and done, there would be no more Russia. Russia would suffer the fate it wanted to impose on Ukraine. It would be split up into smaller countries with no nuclear capabilities with some of their land going to Ukraine, who would no doubt still mine those minerals for us and some of it’s land going to us, the U.S., as the biggest military establishment and base on Earth. Where would that be located, oddly enough, it would be right above China and next to North Korea. To the victor go the spoils, in this case, to us making Russia into russia, we get a huge chunk of their land and the message will be, if you don’t want your land taken from you, then you don’t try and take someone’s land by force.

The added bonus of this happening, no more NATO fees because NATO won’t be needed. It’s a save save situation. For this to happen though, you need some courage, some teamwork and some God blessed luck, which I believe we would have. I always say, don’t leave this problem for our kids to handle, they’re busy gaming, we need to handle this right now or in 100 years, I can almost guarantee that China will be the only super power. Time to man up…..

Whichever President does this goes down as the second greatest President in history. It will be hard to beat Lincoln, but only history will tell and lets be honest, the Demos aren’t exactly the courageous type, (they had two opportunities to intervene and all they did was clear their throat) so it’s going to have to be a Repub that saves the world and this is the only way to that victory.

BENAVIDEZ v. MORRELL

How to best address this fight….. I read different story lines by different media outlets. They called it the best fight with no superstars and they called it the fight for the third best in the division. I ask what the fu*k are these people talking about. I call it the fight with the two most avoided fighters in their division, and in boxing, fighting each other. These media outlets and their reporters always want to put a spin on things. For me, these two fighters, who are putting their own lives at risk for our entertainment, don’t need to have stupid accusations thrown their way prior to a fight to try and influence anyone to maybe favor a fighter. Am I Right….. I’m right…. the last thing that is needed is outside influence in a fight by the power company, which, for some reason, has become the underlined topic of all these press conferences and some idiotic sports writers. Like in everything else, we hope for a fair and unadulterated, meaning no outside influence or magic or electricity or waves of frequency, interfere in a sport that is already dangerous enough. We all know. Both these guys are good guys outside the ring and they do very well to promote their fight by having this limited and faux animosity that only lasts until the final bell sounds. It sells the fight. As Benavidez put it, it’s hype to try make the viewers interested and I agree with him. It a useful marketing tool and it provides us with some interest in the outcome. These tactics are also used to get into the head of their opponent and to create some doubt. The truth of the matter is, they are both such good guys outside the ring, I wish both could win but that’s just not the case. The best thing for the sport is to have the more talented fighter win and then have that person challenge for the title against the winner of Bivol versus Beterbiev.

It gets really tiring reading these articles where someone is trying to make a fighter look like some undeserved person who should go down in flames because he only tipped someone 15% instead of 20% at a restaurant. They’re ridiculous. The only thing they should be reporting on is the obvious skill of both fighters, who I am going to reiterate are both good people, and how those skills match up in the ring. That being said, this is going to be a helluva of a fight. Both are big for the lightweight division so it’s a good thing that they are fighting at the light heavyweight division. They are both feared fighters (in the ring only) and they both pose a threat to be the top dog of the division.

Morrell, the Cuban elite fighter, training out of Milwaukee, brings size and power along with an impressive amateur career and a pro career, that, even though brings in only 11 fights prior to this one, boasts a record of 11 wins and no losses with 9 wins coming by vasovagal syncope…. (loss of consciousness). While that may not be a lot of pro fights, he is a Loma amateur level fighter and has earned a fight with Benavidez. The record of his opposition is something like 217 wins with only 23 losses, that’s not counting Benavidez. His last fight though, which was his first at light heavy, showed that he has to work to carry that bigger weight. He tired out in the later rounds, mainly because he came out heavy in the early rounds in what I believe was an attempt to stop his opponent faster than than the current champion, Beterbiev. He won’t make that mistake here.

Benavidez, a truly avoided fighter, who then receives scrutiny for having to fight fighters that are coming up in weight, sometimes, is a time tested undefeated veteran of the sport, even though he is still young. He should have had 3 or 4 chances at the title at 168, did win the interim WBC, the actual WBC, which he lost on the scales and should have had an opportunity at the other sanctioning bodies but was avoided more than the Blue Ringed Octopus…. right… maybe something else would have been better recognized but what other animal has venom that is 1,000 times more powerful than cyanide and has 8 arms, whereas Benavidez knocks out almost 86% of his opponents and it feels like he has 8 arms because of his hand speed and the different angles he hits you with. I think the analogy or comparison is apropos, which means right on the fuck*ng money. I have to put those asterisks to try and disguise the words. Benavidez has fought everyone and anyone and can be truly said that he has not ducked anyone.

This is going to be a good fight and I already bought my PPV. The undercard is good as well and this is shaping up to be the fight of the year. My prediction is that David is going to win, without a doubt and I’ll put money on it. Good luck to both fighters.

and the new….. POTUS

In boxing when there is a new champ, the announcer always states “AND THE NEW”…. That is indicative of a hard fought fight with someone coming out triumphant…. someone new coming out triumphant. In this case it’s “Once again and the new” POTUS. These next 4 years are going to be super interesting. The one thing you can take away from this is that our elections seem to be fair. The other thing you can take away from this is that people want the people they choose not the people that are chosen for them. In this case, President elect Trump was chosen by the people in a fair pre-general election runoff. There were several candidates and President Elect Trump beat them all. On the Democratic side, there was no selection of the candidate. We were told that Ms. Harris was going to be the nominee whether we like it or not. The outcome came as expected by any sane person. Ms. Harris wasn’t one of the top choices in 2020 for the Dems and she didn’t do well this time around either, not because she isn’t a good person, but because she lacked something in her persona that you can’t really explain but was quantifiable. I’m not saying that any other candidate would have beaten President elect Trump but they would have had a better chance if they were chosen by the people to be their nominee and were not told that this is going to be their nominee. That’s what happened in 2016 when the fix was “seemingly” in to have Mrs. Clinton as the Demo nominee over Bernie and that’s what happened now. It has nothing to do with Ms. Harris being a woman, it has everything to do with subverting the voter’s will and choices.

Personally, I voted RFK. Just because I think he should know what really happened to his dad and uncle. All conspiracy theories aside, I hope he finds out the truth about what happened to his family. I have a theory but until we invent that time machine, there is no way of proving it.

BTW, Dean Phillips would have been a better choice for the Demos… Remember him…. The guy that said Joe Biden couldn’t do it because he was slipping. He was way more pragmatic and the Demo Trump…. Harris wasn’t the only one that wanted to be the candidate, she was the only one allowed to be the candidate.

Lastly, a woman… that said she wanted to turn guys into women…. Fuuuuccckkkk Nooooooo!!!!!! While I know that’s not what she meant, it resonated in all guys brains. We immediately went in winter squirrel mode. We tried to hide our nuts so she couldn’t get at them. She lost the male vote… Nobody is doing the eye tango with me and then trying to cut off my genitalia.

Beterbiev v Bivol

OMG!!! No, not the Mets, even though… right… pretty amazing from the Mets! #Mets Nation! #Mets Country #Mets Magic…. no this OMG!!! is for the best fighting the best at light heavyweight. It’s Betterbeer versus B-ball… uhhh… is that right? That doesn’t seem right. Well, either way, these undefeated fighters are about to go head to head on October 12th and the smart money….. is in my ex-wife’s purse so I’ll be gambling with the rent. If I had to bet… I would probably go with… Let’s talk about the fighters first.

Let’s start with Betterbeoff. Listed at almost 6 foot with a 73 inch reach, Artur has a perfect record of 20 and 0 with 20 knockouts. That means that either this guy is an absolute beast in the ring or his opponents were not that good. After looking at a list of his opponents, the consensus is that there should be someone with a tranquilizer gun nearby because the Beast is on the loose this Saturday. For Artur to win, he simply needs to land a shot… Artur’s punches are short, powerful and seemingly filled with tweety bird juice because every time he lands flush you see tweety birds. If he has a weakness, please comment on the comment section because I can’t find it. The people that say that Beetle, ehhh, Dmitri has better footwork then Artur must have not seen the Joe Smith fight and the Anthony Yarde fight. Artur was moving a lot like Gervonta Davis, hitting, going to a preset spot and waited for his opponent to approach and launching another offensive barrage and then moving and resetting again. It was masterclass. Artur is a world class fighter and future real life DC Comic superhero.

Now for Beaver. Listed at 6 foot with a 72 inch reach, Dmitri is probably the most well rounded fighter in the light heavyweight division. Excellent jab, quick hands, superb footwork, good chin, underrated power with good angle movement. Dmitri has a perfect record of 23 wins and 0 losses with 12 knockouts. If there is a flaw in Dmitri’s game it’s that he doesn’t really turn his punches over to maximize his power, actually force. Dmitri is more of a hit and move guy. He’ll hit you double digit shots in every round and he will go smoke a cigarette in his corner, just to make the fight fair. What he’s going to need for this fight is going to be a short crisp left hook, something that I haven’t seen in his arsenal. For Dmitri to win this fight, he is going to have to be on his game. If there is a punch Artur is susceptible to, it’s the left hook from a slight 30 to 60 degree angle, that means he would have to step subtly to his right and launch a quick left hook and catch Artur on the right side of his chin. Believe it or not, that punch can knock him out, if performed correctly, for a laymen, that would be at Artur’s 11 or 10 o’clock if Artur was looking at the 12 spot. Dmitri can win this, but he is going to have to make a lot less mistakes then Betterbeehive.

Good luck to both fighters and I hope they both win (as I bet on the draw for big money) but my gut says Beterbiev KO’s Bivol. But what does my gut know, it gives me diarrhea when I eat cheesecake, so my gut is a dumbass.

(If) Diddy done didit, Diddy done done

The one thing that can be said is that there is the same panic as in the Epstein case, there is a ton of it. You can cut the fear with a leather whip. Unlike Epstein, who somehow died in prison by hanging himself with just a toothbrush and a toothpick, that is some crazy MaCgyver stuff, Diddy will probably make it to court. What comes out is going to be interesting. But the one thing the Feds are good at is instilling fear and having people turn on themselves. This is going to get interesting if you aren’t one of the people encompassed in this mess. The…. SAD… thing is …. Diddy, if he is guilty of what they say, isn’t the worst of them. There is worse.

@ + neck + to bestow or express excessive love = Anecdote

I’m trying to print something out than this message pops up… Printer needs attention…. My first thought was “My wife built this”… And it just keeps blinking and saying… Printer needs attention… So, I start caressing it and holding it and telling it how special it is… still wouldn’t print anything out. So I started to pull down my pants when it said, I just need more paper.