Like the proverbial political pendulum politics proves people….. ehhhh … something with a p….. pugilistic? pedantic? pluralistic? pedestrian? perplexed? perturbed? I could keep going but my Sesame Street dictionary slash thesaurus has run out of words starting with p that would make sense. The current political environment has some lefty politicos asking questions, some on instagram or tik tok or facebook, but it’s all the same question, why didn’t you vote for us? I think they deserve an answer.

I’m going to start with a simple answer that most people might not agree with. Do you guys remember Bob Dole? The one thing I remember at the time was the guy saying “what’s wrong with cigarettes?” You remember that. Claiming that cigarettes might not be addictive. I voted for the other guy. Obviously cigarette companies were funding that Republican ticket, in part, and he was going to go to bat for them. The Democrats seized on that and stated flat out that this guy didn’t care about anyone. Fast forward some however many years later, the Democrats say the same thing about marijuana that ol’ Bob said about cigarettes. The difference, the marijuana lobby gives a lot of money to the Democrats.

I heard the stories that marijuana isn’t as addictive as nicotine or alcohol by the left leaning dumb dumbs and so they justify their support for the hemp and the pork gratuities they receive from the lobbyists. My opinion, no, the facts are that they’re full of shit. I guess if you have enough power and money you can always find a doctor to say what you want. I know that some of the most prominent left leaning leaders of the democrat party are for it, Bill Maher (might be the only issue I disagree with Bill Maher on), Seth Rogan, Bernie Sanders, Former President Obama, Snoop, and many others… but the fact is that marijuana is a gateway drug and in my former community, marijuana created more havoc than any other drug. I have never known one person that the first drug that they used was something else other than marijuana…. but I know people that died from speed balling, cocaine use, meth and heroin. They all started the same way, smoking a joint. Am I saying that if they didn’t smoke marijuana, they wouldn’t haven’t used the heavier drugs? Yes…. for the love of God… yes. Marijuana got them there as they chased the dragon to new heights and marijuana is the reason they died. For the poor marijuana is an even heavier burden because, unlike the middle class or the rich, there is no rehab stints. The poor and lower middle class have to work and can’t revolve their vacation time around rehab. Poor peoples rehab is called county lock up, which comes with many other problems. The idea that legalized marijuana will solve the drug problem is absolutely ridiculous. If you thought that the punishment that you received for smoking marijuana was too harsh, then you lower the punishment not make the drug legal. Once you introduce something into society, there is no taking it back. Remember Abolition and how well that worked. There’s a reason why the U.S. keeps slipping down the education world table and it isn’t only because of tik tok and youtube.

The disastrous decision by the democrats to legalize marijuana isn’t going to have a great impact immediately, it’s going to take a while like their last great effort to push small businesses into minority neighborhoods. Back in the 70’s there were complaints by the Democrats about the SBA not giving loans equally to minorities. That led to small businesses being brought to minority neighborhoods, mostly liquor stores, because everyone knew that would be the best enterprises in those neighborhoods. 30 years later, you have those same democrats complaining that minority neighborhoods are being exploited and that there is a liquor store at every other corner, this time meant in a derogatory way. The funny thing is (or the worse thing), those people that actually succeeded with those enterprises… no longer live in those minority neighborhoods. They take the money they made and move to Republican cities….why? Because Republicans use the money they make from their businesses and invest in schools, infrastructure and safety…. while the Democrat neighborhoods are investing in jails, meth clinics and embezzlement. The Democrats don’t even stipulate that with a loan or by giving a business an opportunity to open in a minority neighborhood, you have to live in that neighborhood. They don’t invest in their neighborhoods and they complain like it someone else’s fault that the neighborhoods are that way. Unfortunately, more minority neighborhood mayors are arrested or indicted than any other, mostly for embezzlement or abuse of power or under the Hobbs Act. It has become a ridiculous situation with bad decision after bad decision.

At least the Democrats will have a new business in between those liquor stores in minority communities, a marijuana dispensary. The owner of those stores won’t live in that community but the people getting high and barely making rent will. Thanks Demos, another thing that you made better because you can’t see three feet in front of you. And for the rich people with a ton of money, live in one of these neighborhoods for 2 years and then tell me that you think allowing marijuana is a smart decision. And before you say that it was on the ballot and the voters voted for it, I will remind you that those same voters would vote to eliminate all taxes if that proposal was on the ballot. Smart people know that would be disastrous but most people won’t give a damn, they would only think an extra 10 to 40 grand in their pocket. You’re suppose to be the grown up… but all you care about is being liked, winning that next popularity contest that keeps you in office.

Facts about marijuana:

Cannabis is the most commonly used federally illegal drug in the United States; 52.5 million people, or about 19% of Americans, used it at least once in 2021.

Recent research estimated that approximately 3 in 10 people who use cannabis have cannabis use disorder. (a fancy way of saying they’re addicted)

The risk of developing cannabis use disorder is even greater for people who begin to use it before age 18.

Cannabis use directly affects the parts of the brain responsible for memory, learning, attention, decision-making, coordination, emotion, and reaction time. (so it makes you dumb and if you are already dumb, than dumber. So either Jeff Daniels or Jim Carrey. You can forget about being that lawyer, sports star or elected official. These scenarios are for regular long term users, not the occasional spliff and also meant for people that are born normal and not with 180 IQ like some of these people who smoke to control their overactive brains)

Infants, children, and teens (who still have developing brains) are especially susceptible to the adverse effects of cannabis.

Long-term or frequent cannabis use has been linked to increased risk of psychosis or schizophrenia in some users.

Why the fuck would you make this legal unless it was to create zombies.

More reasons why the Democrats are getting whipped at the polling stations to come.

There is this big hoopla about the release of the JFK files. Who did it and why? As these reporters delve into the released files and the CIA taking front stage by knowing of Lee Harvey Oswald movements prior to the assassination of JFK, supposedly, it sure looks like that…. either the CIA was an ineffective agency that had no clue to what was going on or that they knew and might even had a small part in it. Reportedly, this is something that was reported at the time, the CIA and JFK were not on good terms. The question is, who reported that? McCone, the Director of Central Intelligence, even though he was a Republican, was nominated by Kennedy and he admired Kennedy because Kennedy actually read his reports and listened to his advice. McCone was not at odds with Kennedy. Also, it wasn’t the CIA’s responsibility to track Oswald while he was in the U.S., it was the FBI’s. The CIA reported the information to Hoover about Oswald and the FBI was suppose to track him because the CIA was prohibited from running any ops inside the USA unless they were attached to another law enforcement agency who would take lead in the operation.

The questions I have…. have nothing to do with Oswald, they have a lot to do with Jack Ruby. The first question I have is, who knew that Jack Ruby was an FBI informant and a homosexual? That his position as an FBI informant was scrubbed right prior to his assassination of Oswald? Who knew that J. Edgar Hoover, also a homosexual, was at odds with the Kennedy administration prior to his assassination due to wanting to have Hoover replaced? Who knew that Jack Ruby, Oswald’s killer, had spent the days prior to the assassination and the day of the assassination with Bob Vanderslice, another FBI informant, sexuality unknown? Who knew that New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, tried to prosecute Clay Shaw, another homosexual and FBI Informant, David Ferrie, an FBI Informant, homosexual and known pedophile, and Guy Bannister, a once employee of the FBI, and probably human asset for the FBI, who Shaw and Ferrie worked for as CI’s? Who knew the J. Edgar Hoover was accused of having sex with underage boys, never formally investigated or convicted, in both Louisiana and in California and that those incidents were reported to RFK, who probably told JFK?

This is from Wikipeadia from excerpts from the Warren Commission investigation and FBI investigation…. “On November 25, Martin was contacted by the FBI. Martin told the FBI that Ferrie might have hypnotized Oswald into assassinating Kennedy. The FBI considered Martin’s evidence unreliable. Nevertheless, FBI agents interviewed Ferrie twice about Martin’s allegations.^[30] Ferrie admitted that he had made public and private statements criticizing Kennedy’s actions during the Bay of Pigs, but he denied ever stating that the President should be killed. He stated that he had no recollection of having met Oswald and if he had the meeting would have been “very casual”.^[31] Ferrie stated that Martin had “bedeviled him in every manner possible” since sending him out of Gill’s office in an “undiplomatic manner” in June 1963.^[32][33] Gill told the FBI that Martin blamed Ferrie for not getting a job and subsequently “slandered Ferrie at every opportunity”.^[22] The FBI also interviewed about 20 other people in connection with Martin’s allegations. The FBI said that it was unable to develop a substantial case against Ferrie. An inquiry by the House Select Committee on Assassinations, conducted a decade and a half later, concluded that the FBI’s “overall investigation of the 544 Camp Street issue at the time of the assassination was not thorough.”^[34]“

This from the Guardian derived from an interview of a top FBI Agent and supervisor who gave statements to both the FBI and Warren Commission….. “Other accounts of the Director’s alleged sexual activity, if true, would certainly have destroyed him had they become public. A former Bureau inspector and trusted associate named Jimmy Corcoran said years later that Hoover, youthful at the time, had once asked him to deal with a serious “problem”. He had been arrested on sex charges involving a young man during a trip to New Orleans. Corcoran, who had powerful contacts in the state, said he intervened to hush the matter up.” The charges were not brought forward at the State level but I believe that they were secretly sent to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, most likely because the person that was investigating was disgusted by the situation and if he could not do anything abut it, he thought maybe the U.S. Attorney could. That could be where RFK first learned about this incident. This would be the same New Orleans where Ferrie resided and who had been arrested twice on moral offensive charges, most likely sodomy or oral gratification of another man or receiving oral gratification from another man.

J. Edgar Hoover became head of what would be known as the FBI in 1924. Hoover remained in control of the FBI until his death in 1972, never having kids, in the traditional sense, or getting married. Hoover was intelligent and deliberate. He was extremely organized and a great chess player, again, not in the traditional sense that I am aware of…. but maybe. Hoover managed to stay in position as the head of the most elite organizations in America for 48 years. Along the way, Hoover hired his people and made them in charge of different sections within that agency, like Clyde Tolson, his second in command. He was secretive, intelligent, somewhat charismatic, a little dramatic, extremely organized, sought power and if his penis was the size of a thimble, he fit the exact FBI profile of a pedophile.

All these remarks can be verified except for smiling Jack being an FBI informant, only the FBI can verify that statement, if anyone is still around from that time.

While my post seems over the top, if you think about what we know of MKUltra and COINTELPRO and how Hoover managed to stay in power for so long, its an amazing ride for him. The FBI is always tasked with investigating incoming Presidents and legislators, anything that the Hoover found out was his to disseminate as he chose. Hoover was meticulous and has his people follow every bread crumb, especially when it came to Presidents. They had no secrets from him. Anything that was embarrassing or illegal would remain in his files and in exchange or just in case.

Other information about the now deceased director said that J. Edgar Hoover was said to frequent a hotel in La Jolla, California where young Mexican boys, likely underage, were brought to him and then paid for their services and sent back to Mexico with money in their pockets.

If any of this is true, and all these allegation were printed by multiple sources, and if RFK and JFK had found out about this, do you think that J. Edgar Hoover would use his immense power and influence to kill a President and his brother?

This post states through a direct quote from an FBI investigator that Oswald might have been hypnotized into wanting to assassinate the President, has that ever happened before? Reagan…. Trump? And who has the ability to do something like that? According to these articles, the FBI were one of the very few with that technology.

What the FBI has stated in their profiling of these pedophiles, is that they seek powerful positions but rarely elected positions. They travel in groups but never very large, it will most likely garner too much attention. They have some sort of signals so they can identify each other, I’m guessing.

This is a true story, I was once asked what time it was by a guy, I looked at my watch and told him the time, you know, like a normal person that was asked would do, and he replied “never mind”. I asked him, “if you didn’t want to know, why did you ask?” He just shook his head and said “never mind”. I was on a flight from somewhere back to Newark, NJ. When I got home, this was sticking in my mind for some reason, being former law enforcement, when people act like dip shits I usually wanted to know why, but since it isn’t a crime to be a dipshit, I couldn’t do anything to find out. I told my girlfriend about the incident, “the weirdest thing happened to me” and I told her the story. She, being a flight attendant at the time, started to laugh. I asked why are you laughing and she said that is how homosexuals try to find out if you are homosexual, its one of their signals. My thought was, well I’m glad that the response for that wasn’t giving him the right time because that would have been awkward. I never found out what their response was, I never cared but it resonates that pedophiles most likely have the same kind of signals or signs, kinda like a gang sign, I guess. And for the record, I used to be handsome, according to my ex anyway.

The thing that we know is that homosexuals, according to the NIH (if I read that right) a government entity, are 11 times greater to be pedophiles than heterosexuals. That makes sense, a grown man trying to rape another grown man would be almost impossible because even a small grown man, with an adrenaline flow as he tries to stop another grown man from sticking something up his ass, would fight to the death, (I would), which then would just make it necrophilia. Homosexuals would have to prey on young kids, like the priests and altar boys.

Really quick, I want to say that this isn’t an article about homosexuals being pedophiles, I am aware that not all homosexuals are pedophiles but that most pedophiles are homosexual, this also according to the FBI profilers. This is about the person that commissioned most of these studies and that he was most likely the most prolific pedophile in the history of the United States and due to his position and power, no one would stop him. And, maybe when that one person that did try, he most likely had him killed. There is no doubt that the FBI was infiltrated by these people because of Hoover but it is unknown if it is still that way. There are court cases that are being dismissed that relate to some of this but the dismissals make no sense, it only protects people that already have a ton pf power.

Other discerning facts about pedophiles are…. they aren’t generally gym rats but as times change so do they, they are charismatic and usually try to endear themselves to you, they are the cockroaches of the human race… meaning that they adapt quickly to their environment and many lack empathy, probably all of them. They don’t pack a punch in their genital region and are usually close to being considered innies. Like I stated prior, they are intelligent, they have to be and very conniving. And they were fiercely loyal to each other, given that not many people share their interests, like Tolson was to Hoover.

Also, I believe that Hoover died while being investigated by the FBI. A stress heart attack in his sleep. His second in command, Tolson, who became the Director of the FBI for one day before being replaced by Patrick Gray, fell ill immediately after handing over the keys to the house to Gray. Tolson would die a short while later from the affects of a stress induced stroke. Also the tell tale signs of an FBI investigation. Hoover fought hard to not relinquish power but it was ultimately the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation into him that killed him. If you want to see files relevant to the assassination of JFK and RFK, then you need to request the files into the investigation into J. Edgar Hoover, I believe that should be the files that should be asked for without redaction.

This is just my opinion but it makes way more sense then the conspiracy theories that are already out there. If I had to guess, this would be my guess, especially given how the FBI was ostracized by the Warren commission for doing such a shitty job in investigating the death of JFK. The FBI investigated and they couldn’t find themselves, it seems right. J. Edgar Hoover was most likely a very bad person but he didn’t care. Now, if I build a hotel and name it Hitler’s House, you can assume something about anyone in that hotel. Whoever named the FBI building must of not known Hoover’s legacy but still, that is some nasty stuff, right.

Can you imagine the fallout or the consequences if what I opine is correct? And it most likely is. That the head of the FBI was diddling little kids in secret and killed a President to keep that secret. Do you know what that would have done to the reputation of the FBI at that time and all the cases that they were involved in if that had come out. They would have to have freed everyone they ever arrested. No, killing Hoover and his longtime gaypal was the only solution.